Immigration News
Immigration News
The Supreme Court held today that under immigration law, a certain class of non-citizens facing deportation are not required to have a bond hearing if they’ve been held in detention over six months. The 5-3 ruling, however, avoided a judgment on whether the Constitution requires such hearings.
The ruling is a defeat for supporters of immigrant rights groups and it is considered a failure for many, including us. We believe that there should be greater procedural protections for non-citizens facing deportation. The case was brought by a class of immigrants.
The decision could have unpredictable implications under President Donald Trump. He has overseen a hard turn in enforcing immigration laws. All new measures implemented and planned by the current administration were inhumane and inconsiderate towards immigrants. The administration increased the use of detention to house undocumented immigrants awaiting court decisions about whether they can stay in the US.
The class of immigrants in the case are all incarcerated and include lawful permanent residents with minor criminal history and asylum seekers who have passed an initial screening but are waiting for the chance to raise their claims. It does not include any individuals that the government believes to be national security threats.
Lower courts had divided on how to interpret the immigration detention statutes at issue in the case. In the case at hand, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of all classes mandating an individualized bond hearing after six months of detention.
About DACA
Also, yesterday the Supreme Court decided yesterday to not interfere in the DACA conversation. It leaves the decision to the lower courts to decide. Which means that, for now, DACA holders will continue to have legal status and all applications can be renewed. If you have DACA and need to renew, call us today! 770-913-0800
Related posts

The Future of Habeas Corpus: Legal Challenges and Constitutional Safeguards
Summary The blog explains how habeas corpus, a fundamental legal right enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, ensures protection against unlawful detention. It highlights the current

Can Entrepreneurs and Business Owners Qualify for a TN Visa?
Summary If you’re a Canadian or Mexican entrepreneur living in the U.S. or planning to launch a business here, you may be wondering: Can I

Recent Habeas Corpus Cases: Legal Precedents and Their Implications
Summary The article explains how recent habeas corpus cases, including Rivers v. Guerrero and W.M.M. v. Trump, have significant implications for the interpretation of the