On this page

          Share Blogs

          Immigration Judges Quit

          Immigration Judges Quit

          CNN reported today (Friday, December 27, 2019) that Immigration judges have left their positions in 2019 at nearly twice the rate of previous years with many citing the Trump administration’s anti-immigrant policies as a deciding factor.

          Over the past year, in the heat of a border migration crisis, 45 judges have left, moved into new roles in the immigration court system — which is run by the Justice Department — or passed away, according to the department. That’s nearly double the number who departed their posts in fiscal years 2018 and 2017, when 24 and 21 judges left, respectively, according to data provided by the judges union.


          President Donald Trump has repeatedly criticized the nation’s immigration system, specifically taking issue with the practice of releasing immigrants while they await their court dates. To remedy that, the administration has sought to hire more immigration judges.

          In 2018, the Trump administration issued new performance guidelines for immigration judges that included quotas for hearing cases, with the goal of speeding up deportations and reducing the backlog of cases within the immigration system, the Wall Street Journal reported. The backlog of immigration cases has almost doubled since Trump took office, according to USA Today, from roughly half a million cases to over a million as of September 2019.


          While the reasons for individual judges moving on from their posts vary, interviews to those who left in recent months reveal a common theme of frustration over a mounting number of policy changes that, they argue, have chipped away at their authority.

          Earlier this month, the Justice Department announced 28 new immigration judges, bringing the number of such judges to more than 465, a record high. The majority come from government backgrounds.

          It remains to be seen what changes, if any, are in store for the court system, but some of those who have already left their posts as judges carry guilt for departing, concerned about who may fill their jobs.

          Background

          Immigration judges are employees of the Department of Justice, not the federal court system, and therefore must follow the policies and regulations coming from the incumbent administration.

          Related posts

          USCIS Temporary Office Closure Extended until at least April 7

          Quick Answer

          The U.S. Department of Labor announced on October 8, 2026 that it will stop accepting new PERM applications and stop processing pending ones involving Microsoft, Adobe, Cognizant, Infosys, Tata, Wipro, HCL and Capgemini. The action targets one step of the employer-sponsored green card process at eight named employers. H-1B visas are not suspended, PERM remains open to other employers and nothing in the announcement cancels approved I-140 petitions. No end date has been given.

          Summary

          • The suspension covers PERM labor certification for eight named employers and is not a nationwide halt.
          • New filings are blocked and pending applications are frozen, which is legally different from a denial.
          • The Labor Department has not published a written notice or named the regulation it is relying on.
          • Officials did not address PERM cases already certified, approved I-140 petitions or pending I-485 applications.
          • Microsoft and TCS have responded publicly. Most of the other companies have not.
          • What a worker should do next depends on the stage the case had reached before October 8.

          Ready to Resolve Your Immigration Issue?

          Whether it’s a work visa, green card, citizenship, or deportation defense, our Atlanta immigration attorneys are ready to help you find the best path forward.

          Get a Free Case Evaluation

          Tell us about your case. An attorney will review it and get back to you.

            Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.

            Prefer to talk?