Victory to immigrants facing deportation.
The U.S. Supreme Court, on Thursday, April 29, 2021, offering hope to thousands of long-term immigrants facing deportation in a ruling that faulted the federal government for improperly notifying a man who came to the United States illegally from Guatemala to appear for a U.S. Supreme Court, on Thursday, April 29, 2021, offering hope to thousands of long-term immigrants seeking to avoid deportation in a ruling that faulted the federal government for improperly notifying a man who.
In a 6-3 decision, the justices ruled that the government must comply with a requirement that immigrants receive detailed notices about their deportation hearings. This case challenges the government’s efforts to expedite the removal of some undocumented immigrants facing deportation in the US.
“In this case, the law’s terms ensure that, when the federal government seeks a procedural advantage against an individual, it will at least supply him with a single and reasonably comprehensive statement of the nature of the proceedings against him,” conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in the ruling.
Under federal law, immigrants who are not lawful permanent residents may apply to have their deportation canceled if they have been in the United States for at least 10 years. The time counted to reach that threshold ends when the government initiates immigration proceedings with a notice to appear, a limit is known as the “stop-time” rule.
In 2013, eight years after he entered the country, police stopped Niz-Chavez for a broken taillight on his vehicle. The federal government followed up with a notice to appear for a deportation hearing.
After the Supreme Court in 2018 found in another case that notices to appear that omitted the time and date of the hearing were deficient, Niz-Chavez cited his faulty notice to argue that the stop-time rule had not been triggered in his case.
The Cincinnati, Ohio-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against him in 2019, saying that the relevant information can be sent in more than one document. The Supreme Court overturned that ruling.
Weinstock Immigration Lawyers creates and defends the opportunity for individuals, families, and businesses to seek and achieve the American Dream. If you need help with your deportation hearing or other immigration matters, visit visaprosstg.wpengine.com or call us at (770) 913-0800.
Source: www.reuters.com
Related Posts

TPS 2026: Supreme Court Battle & What Holders Must Do Now
Summary Understand how the ongoing TPS Supreme Court battle in 2026 could impact work authorization, deportation protection, and immigration planning. Learn what Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is

Gold Card vs EB-5: Which Investor Visa Is Right for You in 2026?
Summary Compare the key differences between the EB-5 investor visa and the proposed Gold Card immigration concept in 2026. Understand why the EB-5 program remains the only

Denaturalization 2026: Who Is at Risk & How to Protect Your Citizenship
Summary Learn what denaturalization means and why US citizenship revocation cases are receiving more attention in 2026. Understand the most common reasons the government may challenge naturalized